Hi, I’m wondering I have a Prestigo Net Drive 500Gb (PNAS3ND500) which I think is RDC 2882 Chip. I have problem with vista connecting SMB/CIFS over ethernet, I tried registry tweak for LM NTLM session authentication but no differance in operation, I can see folders and that’s about it, cant do anything from vista Their site is not good for browsing and they no longer list this model or I cant get to it, anyhow they list the PNAS3GB0750 model which looks exactly the same with the following firmware. The firmware they have on there site is:- Firmware (version 45-69) Win98/2K/XP English I looked with HxD and it mentions RDC 2882 v0.6.9 I have not tried this because I do not think this version is vista compatible either:/ I’m wondering can I update my net drive with firmware or NAS-BASIC48? I am not sure because I don’t know whats involved how to update everything? @Rikski How dare you use my work without asking permission, even worse, you removed the fact that it was my work from the completed artical!

128 thoughts on “ LANDISK: NAS-BASIC48. Files), does not work properly. It is probably caused by a not updating directory (list). A refresh (F5) is needed to update the directory. As sync software does not do that, it can not work as it should. I have a Sitecom MD-250 and firmware is NAS-BASIC45a, LOADER 69. The current transfer rate.

RIKSKI-NAS v1.0? Drajvera roadmax. What version is it anyway? Looks like ViperNAS v1.3! If you had read my site you would have realised that I am more than willing to alter it for anybody. In fact, I am more than willing to add your ideas to my UI, and give you FULL CREDIT for the fact that they are your ideas I cant see any trace of it being my work in that interface. Just FYI, I am a UK user, I just dont use the data on the NAS drive.

I am happy to change it. As for allowing hidden shares?

Throw me the code and I’ll add it and GIVE YOU CREDIT! Get the idea?

Ben Get the ORIGINAL ViperNas v1.3 (soon to be 1.4) here. @Ben, Ok, Ben – Firstly calm down. Yes the GUI is basically your code – (I never Denied it – infact I even – quoted a thanks in the ReadMe – which you seem to be ignoring). So everyone (if you haven’t read it in the ReadMe) please note:- this is Ben’s interface (yet, slightly modified). I hope that makes you feel slightly better, I am not one for ripping off peoples work (which is why I paid respect in the ReadMe). Now, Why would I want to share the details on how to do a Hidden share – when you are not prepared to share your work?

(- just look at my modified code to yours – help yourself!) – Now, on another angle Ben – Did it occur to you that it is quite a compliment to have your work modified (and yet be thanked for it) and included inside the Firmware? I am sorry that you are offended, Perhaps in future I will not bother to contribute – besides your interface is the best I have seen! Regards Rikski. @Ben, Already looks like you’ve released V1.4 of ViperNAS.